Public Feedback wanted
by 17 November 2008

In 2006, the Auckland
Regional
Council sought public feedback on a proposed new storm water pipe on
Support Proposal: 1
submission
Oppose Proposal: 89 submissions
Forms have been sent out by the City Council seeking feedback on new options, some of which avoid building this large structure on the beach.
There is an existing
storm water/sewage
outfall at 39/41 Marine Pde. By making better use of this, the proposed
new
pipe on
Option 2:
Existing Outfall +
Overflow
1/ Refurbish existing pipes at 39/41 Marine Pde, & use this existing outfall as main discharge point. (The pipes need to be re-lined, & some upgrades may be required around the pipe junctions.)
2/
Add a smaller ‘overflow’ pipe that
exits onto
Large overland flows on grass/sand could cause erosion. A new modified Option 2 addresses this:
Option 2 discharging behind existing Boat Ramp
1/ Extend the overflow pipe to follow the existing seawall along the front of 33 Marine Parade (to the north of the beach), and exit behind the existing concrete boat ramp.
2/ Design the pipe to blend in by either matching the existing natural papa rock or by looking like a concrete seawall, whichever is most appropriate for each section of the pipe.
3/ Prevent the current scouring of the beach by redirecting the existing storm water outlet at the northern corner of the beach into the new pipe.
(This was proposed by the author & owners of 33 Marine Parade, and is preferred by them over Option 4. It is not listed explicitly by the Council as a separate option.)
Option 3 sends all the storm water to the existing outfall at 39/41 Marine Pde, and so requires no new structures on the beach or reserve. It needs a new pipe at 39/41 Marine Parade. This could potentially affect buildings at these locations, and so is a potential risk for the Council & property owners.
These 3 options avoid
a large new
outfall structure on
1/ address the flooding in Marine Parade
2/ discharge storm water (i.e. road runoff), not sewage, on the beach
3/ allow for future storm water/sewage separation
4/ give similar reductions in the frequency of raw sewage discharges into the harbour.
Options 1 and 5 are significantly more expensive. Option 1 may not fix the flooding in Marine Parade.
Options 2 &
3: Low cost options with minimal impact on
Registering
your continued opposition to the large
pipe (Option 4) will help protect
Complete the City Council feedback form, or see www.aucklandcity.govt.nz/MarineParade to give your feedback online
Select options other than 4, eg “Option 3 (if property owners agree) or Option 2”
Add a note opposing the original Option 4
Council Report
This document uses information and
drawings from the council report:
Plans
of
Options

Option 2
refurbishes the existing two
pipes under 39/41 Marine Pde; these carry most of the storm water flows
and continue to act as a sewage overflow. A
new 0.525m underground storm water (not sewage) overflow pipe either
exits in
the reserve, or extends around the front of 33 Marine Pde to exit in an
existing
concrete boat ramp. This extended pipe would be disguised as papa rock
or
seawall.

Option 3
installs a new pipe under
39/41 Marine Pde running down to the existing outfall. These
carry storm water and continue to act as a sewage overflow. There
are no new structures on

Option
4, the original option,
brings a 1.05m diameter underground pipe down to a new outfall
structure on
Source:
Notes:
1/ New pipes in the reserve or at 39/41
Marine Pde would be thrust underground
giving minimal surface disturbance.
2/ This unofficial document attempts to
summarise the key options and
their impact on
3/ The author, Andrew
Mason, would like to acknowledge the valuable contributions made by the
Auckland
City Council’s consultants and engineers in acknowledging the issues
and
working to develop these alternative options.
Document
prepared by Andrew Mason, 33 Marine
Parade, pipe@hbcc.net.nz, 021
884 673, 12 Nov 2008